<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blended Un-Intrusive Ads Work 850% Better</title>
	<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/</link>
	<description>How To Grow Your Blog Traffic</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Locjan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-16680</link>
		<author>Locjan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-16680</guid>
		<description>if we use ads that stood it show it self its an ads so we hide it with un intrusive but now people get more clever to know which one is an ads. so just dont put ads that can annoying visitor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if we use ads that stood it show it self its an ads so we hide it with un intrusive but now people get more clever to know which one is an ads. so just dont put ads that can annoying visitor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-15702</link>
		<author>Rachel</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 07:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-15702</guid>
		<description>
I was just thinking to myself that &lt;strong&gt;your&lt;/strong&gt; ads were killing this blog.

It's not even the amount of ads - it's the placement of them. They are distracting to the reader.

It's &lt;strong&gt;ironic&lt;/strong&gt; that you chose to post on this subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just thinking to myself that <strong>your</strong> ads were killing this blog.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not even the amount of ads - it&#8217;s the placement of them. They are distracting to the reader.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s <strong>ironic</strong> that you chose to post on this subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreina Cecilio</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-2759</link>
		<author>Andreina Cecilio</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>when they say it's ove. Andreina Cecilio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when they say it&#8217;s ove. Andreina Cecilio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avinash</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-2071</link>
		<author>avinash</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-2071</guid>
		<description>hi kya haal hai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi kya haal hai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankesh Kothari</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-270</link>
		<author>Ankesh Kothari</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rainer.  Excellent insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rainer.  Excellent insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainer</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-266</link>
		<author>Rainer</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>I made nearly the same experiences when I put some adsense blocks on my stocks-tips pages. Useing some outstanding styles (colors and background) gave my a clickrate of about 0.6% while a "embedded" style made it up to about 2%.
That's about a 300% raise. But another tech did even make it up to 4%. It's the click-block-ads, styled as a line of keywords within the flow of normal content.

Think one needs to change the ad-layout from time to time - just try to be unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made nearly the same experiences when I put some adsense blocks on my stocks-tips pages. Useing some outstanding styles (colors and background) gave my a clickrate of about 0.6% while a &#8220;embedded&#8221; style made it up to about 2%.<br />
That&#8217;s about a 300% raise. But another tech did even make it up to 4%. It&#8217;s the click-block-ads, styled as a line of keywords within the flow of normal content.</p>
<p>Think one needs to change the ad-layout from time to time - just try to be unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G K Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-67</link>
		<author>G K Singh</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 19:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>You have lots of information. Your blog is going to superhit soon. What you think about my blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have lots of information. Your blog is going to superhit soon. What you think about my blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankesh Kothari</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-64</link>
		<author>Ankesh Kothari</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 11:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dave and John.

Not sure what I was thinking while I wrote the post... 

I totally didn't mean "intrusive"...

...In fact, I meant to write "un-intrusive"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave and John.</p>
<p>Not sure what I was thinking while I wrote the post&#8230; </p>
<p>I totally didn&#8217;t mean &#8220;intrusive&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;In fact, I meant to write &#8220;un-intrusive&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-63</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 11:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Hasn't Google been telling us all for ages that the CTR would be higher if the ads are intrusive (though they call them blended in) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasn&#8217;t Google been telling us all for ages that the CTR would be higher if the ads are intrusive (though they call them blended in) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-62</link>
		<author>Dave</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 11:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I don't think "intrusive" is the right word for this ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8220;intrusive&#8221; is the right word for this <img src='http://www.blogclout.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
