<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blended Un-Intrusive Ads Work 850% Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/</link>
	<description>How To Grow Your Blog Traffic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:19:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-19846</link>
		<dc:creator>kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-19846</guid>
		<description>Well, earning from ads is nothing wrong and I appreciate the level of detail in many of your other posts. 
But disguising ads in blogs (or any content for that matter) is cheating your reader/user! Almost sounds as if you believe business and ethics are two banks of a river..
Works only temporarily that way though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, earning from ads is nothing wrong and I appreciate the level of detail in many of your other posts.<br />
But disguising ads in blogs (or any content for that matter) is cheating your reader/user! Almost sounds as if you believe business and ethics are two banks of a river..<br />
Works only temporarily that way though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Locjan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-16680</link>
		<dc:creator>Locjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-16680</guid>
		<description>if we use ads that stood it show it self its an ads so we hide it with un intrusive but now people get more clever to know which one is an ads. so just dont put ads that can annoying visitor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if we use ads that stood it show it self its an ads so we hide it with un intrusive but now people get more clever to know which one is an ads. so just dont put ads that can annoying visitor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-15702</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 07:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-15702</guid>
		<description>
I was just thinking to myself that &lt;strong&gt;your&lt;/strong&gt; ads were killing this blog.

It&#039;s not even the amount of ads - it&#039;s the placement of them. They are distracting to the reader.

It&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;ironic&lt;/strong&gt; that you chose to post on this subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just thinking to myself that <strong>your</strong> ads were killing this blog.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not even the amount of ads &#8211; it&#8217;s the placement of them. They are distracting to the reader.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s <strong>ironic</strong> that you chose to post on this subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreina Cecilio</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreina Cecilio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>when they say it&#039;s ove. Andreina Cecilio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when they say it&#8217;s ove. Andreina Cecilio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avinash</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator>avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-2071</guid>
		<description>hi kya haal hai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi kya haal hai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankesh Kothari</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankesh Kothari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rainer.  Excellent insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rainer.  Excellent insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainer</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>I made nearly the same experiences when I put some adsense blocks on my stocks-tips pages. Useing some outstanding styles (colors and background) gave my a clickrate of about 0.6% while a &quot;embedded&quot; style made it up to about 2%.
That&#039;s about a 300% raise. But another tech did even make it up to 4%. It&#039;s the click-block-ads, styled as a line of keywords within the flow of normal content.

Think one needs to change the ad-layout from time to time - just try to be unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made nearly the same experiences when I put some adsense blocks on my stocks-tips pages. Useing some outstanding styles (colors and background) gave my a clickrate of about 0.6% while a &#8220;embedded&#8221; style made it up to about 2%.<br />
That&#8217;s about a 300% raise. But another tech did even make it up to 4%. It&#8217;s the click-block-ads, styled as a line of keywords within the flow of normal content.</p>
<p>Think one needs to change the ad-layout from time to time &#8211; just try to be unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G K Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>G K Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 19:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>You have lots of information. Your blog is going to superhit soon. What you think about my blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have lots of information. Your blog is going to superhit soon. What you think about my blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankesh Kothari</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankesh Kothari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 11:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dave and John.

Not sure what I was thinking while I wrote the post... 

I totally didn&#039;t mean &quot;intrusive&quot;...

...In fact, I meant to write &quot;un-intrusive&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave and John.</p>
<p>Not sure what I was thinking while I wrote the post&#8230; </p>
<p>I totally didn&#8217;t mean &#8220;intrusive&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;In fact, I meant to write &#8220;un-intrusive&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 11:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogclout.com/blog/intrusive-ads-work-850-better/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Hasn&#039;t Google been telling us all for ages that the CTR would be higher if the ads are intrusive (though they call them blended in) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasn&#8217;t Google been telling us all for ages that the CTR would be higher if the ads are intrusive (though they call them blended in) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
