<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimizing Your Blog Design Layout (Part-1)</title>
	<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/</link>
	<description>How To Grow Your Blog Traffic</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress Theme Selection &#124; TheLocoMono</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-10112</link>
		<author>WordPress Theme Selection &#124; TheLocoMono</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-10112</guid>
		<description>[...] Column Layout (suggested per BlogCloutA and reader [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Column Layout (suggested per BlogCloutA and reader [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pelf</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-2692</link>
		<author>pelf</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;If you still want to go with the three-column theme, please make sure that your two narrow sidebars are not together. Make your wide content column separate both the sidebars.&lt;/em&gt;

But I read somewhere that if one has the 2 narrow sidebars separated, visitors will have to spend extra time scrolling down both sidebars. But if placed together, visitors will only need to scan the sidebars once.

Further, I personally think that sidebars are only for new visitors because loyal readers or feed readers won't be bothered with the sidebars. Or they may have remembered by heart what are the elements on your sidebars =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>If you still want to go with the three-column theme, please make sure that your two narrow sidebars are not together. Make your wide content column separate both the sidebars.</em></p>
<p>But I read somewhere that if one has the 2 narrow sidebars separated, visitors will have to spend extra time scrolling down both sidebars. But if placed together, visitors will only need to scan the sidebars once.</p>
<p>Further, I personally think that sidebars are only for new visitors because loyal readers or feed readers won&#8217;t be bothered with the sidebars. Or they may have remembered by heart what are the elements on your sidebars =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael from Pro Blog Design</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-1366</link>
		<author>Michael from Pro Blog Design</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>I see what you're saying, and you could well be right. The resolution comes into play as well I think. For instance, your blog is made for 800x600, so I agree entirely that 2 cols is the right choice. Mine is made for 1024x768 though, so if I went with just 2 columns, I might end up with a very large content area, or too much empty space. I suppose, as with all design tips, "it depends" on the blog. :)

I also think that for most people, having 2 column can really force them to cut things out of their blog, reducing clutter. Having 3 columns gives them the illusion that they more room to work with, which leads to more widgets, and a messy blog... :(

And thanks for the reply. What you said about eye movement definitely makes a lot of sense. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you&#8217;re saying, and you could well be right. The resolution comes into play as well I think. For instance, your blog is made for 800&#215;600, so I agree entirely that 2 cols is the right choice. Mine is made for 1024&#215;768 though, so if I went with just 2 columns, I might end up with a very large content area, or too much empty space. I suppose, as with all design tips, &#8220;it depends&#8221; on the blog. <img src='http://www.blogclout.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I also think that for most people, having 2 column can really force them to cut things out of their blog, reducing clutter. Having 3 columns gives them the illusion that they more room to work with, which leads to more widgets, and a messy blog&#8230; <img src='http://www.blogclout.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And thanks for the reply. What you said about eye movement definitely makes a lot of sense. <img src='http://www.blogclout.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankesh Kothari</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<author>Ankesh Kothari</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Michael:&lt;/b&gt; Excellent question.  And you're right of course.  Clutter is the BIG problem for blog optimization.  
&lt;br&gt;
But its easier to reduce the perception of clutter with 2 columns than with 3.  The reason being, people's eye moment with 2 columns will be a bit more linear than with 3 columns.  With 3 columns, people's eyes will wander zig-zag - which adds to confusion.  With 2 columns, their eyes will scroll straight down.
&lt;br&gt;
Saying that, if bloggers have a lot of options and clutter in 2 columns too - readers will just ignore the entire column.
&lt;br&gt;
The best results come when you give just 1 or 2 specific action steps to readers to do per page - whether you have 2 columns or 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Michael:</b> Excellent question.  And you&#8217;re right of course.  Clutter is the BIG problem for blog optimization.<br />
<br />
But its easier to reduce the perception of clutter with 2 columns than with 3.  The reason being, people&#8217;s eye moment with 2 columns will be a bit more linear than with 3 columns.  With 3 columns, people&#8217;s eyes will wander zig-zag - which adds to confusion.  With 2 columns, their eyes will scroll straight down.<br />
<br />
Saying that, if bloggers have a lot of options and clutter in 2 columns too - readers will just ignore the entire column.<br />
<br />
The best results come when you give just 1 or 2 specific action steps to readers to do per page - whether you have 2 columns or 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael from Pro Blog Design</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-1095</link>
		<author>Michael from Pro Blog Design</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>Is clutter not the bigger problem for CTR, rather than the number of columns?

I could just as easily make a horrible 2col layout as 3col. :?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is clutter not the bigger problem for CTR, rather than the number of columns?</p>
<p>I could just as easily make a horrible 2col layout as 3col. <img src='http://www.blogclout.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-205</link>
		<author>Brian Vaughan</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Great post, I totally agree with the using the 2 column layouts over the 3, there is just way to much hitting the user at one time with a 3 column layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I totally agree with the using the 2 column layouts over the 3, there is just way to much hitting the user at one time with a 3 column layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shinil</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-204</link>
		<author>Shinil</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ankesh for yet another gem of a post. Keep this in mind for my blog to be launched soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ankesh for yet another gem of a post. Keep this in mind for my blog to be launched soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete White</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-199</link>
		<author>Pete White</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Good call with the 2 column approach, i never like blogs with 3 columns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call with the 2 column approach, i never like blogs with 3 columns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankesh Kothari</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-197</link>
		<author>Ankesh Kothari</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mani.  Good article.  Although I would now recommend people use layers instead of tables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mani.  Good article.  Although I would now recommend people use layers instead of tables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Schwager</title>
		<link>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-196</link>
		<author>Jared Schwager</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogclout.com/blog/optimizing-your-blog-design-layout-part-1/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Great timing! I've just started working on my new blog design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great timing! I&#8217;ve just started working on my new blog design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
